Friday, July 17, 2020

Covid19: When the Pandemic becomes Endemic – Spoiler Alerts



Written by an acquaintance of mine on July 16th, 2020.


Covid19: When the Pandemic becomes Endemic – Spoiler Alerts

 

Okay, friends and family – I have been asked by many folks to share my thoughts about Covid-19 not only because I am a “front-line” person who goes to work to take care of Covid-19 people every day but also because I am an MD/PhD educated, board certified pulmonologist who has been operating ventilators and reading science long before it was cool. Fine – I am happy to share my expertise but… first a disclaimer…

 

I don’t care about convincing anyone of anything. I’m not interested in a debate or trading references or anything of the kind. If you think I’m wrong on something – that’s great – I am not encouraging a debate. This is my perspective given my education and experience. If something is confusing or needs clarifying, then I will try to clear it up but honestly, if you don’t want to read more – don’t. It’s not a big deal, and I don’t really need to educate anyone about anything outside of work. Secondly, some of what I will relate/suggest is my approach alone (and my opinion alone! Based on my own thinking about Covid-19) – you won’t find it in “current guidelines” or UpToDate or anywhere else (especially not the avalanche of bullshit – ahem, expert opinion coming out of XYZ).  Again, no need to debate and feel free to ignore this whole post and we can go on being friends as usual. Third, some of what I have to share is upsetting – so be it – this is intended for an adult audience only.

 

For practical reasons I have divided this up in sections – and I will try to employ a brief Q & A, or FAQ approach – if you have a legit Q or FAQ, I might add it to the FAQ – you never know.   And finally, unlike Tony Fauci – I don’t have to worry about offending Trump or Trumpers with a little reality and/or my political opinions such as they cross-pollinate with this subject. Again, these are my thoughts and your feelings about MY opinions do NOT interest me, this is strictly a public service for those that want it.

Okidoke!!!

 

Practical Stuff – i.e. What do I do WHEN I get Covid-19

 

Q –Will I get Covid-19?

A –Yes.  There is enough community spread of this disease that we will all get exposed sooner or later, and we basically all get it when we are exposed with an adequate inoculum (more on that later).

 

Q –If I have to get Covid-19 – why take any precautions at all?

A – A few good reasons – collectively, we cannot afford to get it all at once – since it is really hard to guess who will need hospital oxygen and ICU level care (ventilators and other sexy stuff), we don’t want to run out. The whole point of “Flattening the curve” was not to prevent any spread (or new cases). That’s impossible – but if we slow down the rate that people get it – then we can treat those who would die without good treatment. Also, the longer you avoid it – the better we get at treating it. I’m already better at treating this than I was three months ago, and I have access to better information about using steroids, ventilator strategies, anticoagulation, blah blah blah all the time so the longer you and your family avoid getting sick, the more experience and tools I will have when I treat you.

 

Q –How do I know if I have Covid-19?

A –You will have fever (get a digital thermometer) and you will feel crummy. If you have a fever and feel crummy, you have Covid until proven otherwise. Act accordingly (see below).   If you are still too stupid to get a $10 digital thermometer while there is a global pandemic and you think you are gonna die – send me a message, I’ll loan you one, but that’s pretty stupid. Hahahahha.

 

Q –Should I get tested if I have a fever and feel crumby?

A –Sure – won’t hurt. But if you don’t get tested then still assume that you have it.

 

Q – I feel okay (no fever, nothing really new (out of my usual hyperaware state now with every little throat scratchy or sneeze making me crazy). Should I get tested?

A –No. On a symptomatic day – the RT-PCR test (Nasal swab test) is only 65% sensitive so a negative test doesn’t mean much and it only is a snapshot for that day. A lot of people think they can get tested and then be okay visiting old relatives. That’s a silly waste of a test. If you’re symptomatic you shouldn’t visit vulnerable people and if you’re not, you only have (at best) about a fifty-fifty chance of detecting your infection and you can still get infected as you travel. As of now, tests for the “worried well” are just wasted tests.

 

Q –I’m sick (I have Covid) – what should I do?

A –Rest. For reelz. Isolate. For reelz. If you are symptomatic it takes 1-2 weeks to really get better. Plan on that. Do not take a lot of weird bullshit you’ve never taken before. If you do that you won’t know if you are sick from being sick or sick from the new weird bullshit. Weird bullshit includes hydroxychloroquine (or anything that sounds the same), mega dose of any vitamin or anything you read about that is being used to treat another disease that doctors are “investigating.” You CAN take half a full-size aspirin a day (since Covid causes blood clots and strokes) unless you have had issues with bleeding and you SHOULD take STROKE symptoms seriously (even if you are young).!!!!! So facial droop, slurred speech, can’t move my arm – don’t blow that off. That’s a real emergency– go to the emergency room right away – you may need to get a clot fished out of your lucky head and there are strict time limits before that kind of thing stops helping.

 

Q –I’m sick (I have Covid) and I’m having trouble breathing. What should I do?

A –Go to the emergency room or at a minimum check your oxygen blood saturation (digital monitors are $20-$40 on Amazon). If you are reading less than 92% on room air then you need oxygen – suck it up and go the emergency room – you have Covid already – and you need oxygen. If you don’t trust the reading (i.e. It reads 60 or 70 or 80 %) test it on another human (who feels okay) and if it works on them, but it reads less than 92% on you, then again, go to the hospital. You might not feel that bad, but your body is short of oxygen and you could collapse at any time. If you can’t spend that kind of money on a O2 monitor and you think you are dying/hypoxic send me a message and I’ll loan you a monitor. But honestly – it’s like $30.

 

Q –How do I avoid/delay getting Covid?

A –Wear a mask (over your nose).  While wearing one under your nose might prevent you from spreading it – the limited protection you get from wearing one with your nose exposed is zero. Avoid hanging out indoors with people you don’t want to get Covid from. Everyone you spend time with indoors should be a person you don’t mind getting Covid from – if fact, you should just assume that you will get it if they have it (they might not know it).  

For the record, isolating amongst people you live with next to impossible. Same with cars. You won’t get it from touching random doorknobs or street signs or even shopping cart handles. Way way too much time and bullshit has been spent trying to “sterilize” objects. Put your effort into thinking about your direct contact with people – especially inside. In case it isn’t obvious yet, outside is better. Air flow is good (it reduces the concentration of any infectious agent/inoculum) and sunlight kills Covid pretty quick. 10 minutes in the sun kills 90% of the virus. You won’t get it from a casual walk-by contact while you are outside exercising – that’s very unlikely, you’re going to get it from a party or at work or delivering a very large pizza to a very small person in a medium sized elevator.

 

Q –How do I reduce my chance of dying when I get Covid?

A –Delay your infection as long as possible. Stop yelling at everyone else for not keeping you safe – it’s not their job and it’s not really possible and it raises your blood pressure. You are part of an endemic infection attacking our species and that’s not going to change anytime soon – so stop attacking your friends (the only people who will listen to you anyway) and start being proactive. Get your chronic health bullshit under control –if you smoke – quit. If you have high blood pressure – stop with the salt/junk food. If you’re fat – lose some weight. If you’re diabetic, take your meds. You can’t make yourself younger or change your blood type but you have had (and will have) literally months to address this stuff and if you face this disease with your chronic health bullshit out of control, you have blown off the things you could have done to help yourself get through it more easily.

 

Q – I don’t want my sick-old-obese-immunosuppressed-diabetic-friend-lover-mom-dad-kid-mailperson to get Covid – what can I do besides pointing fingers at everyone else and being a pain in the ass?

A –Keep the vulnerable isolated and interact with them yourself in low-risk/transmission ways – Assume it is in the community. I’m sorry to say but those with real risk factors have to seriously consider that they will be in isolation for a very long time – perhaps indefinitely. Even with a vaccine (or more likely many suboptimal vaccine options) they will still face a difficult choice about how much risk to allow into their lives balanced against how much they want to interact with their friends-lovers-moms-dads-kids-mailpersons. The risk from small groups of people (or a single person) on a given asymptomatic day is really pretty low and we should keep in mind that some of our “vulnerable” people would rather risk dying than miss out on years of the kind of in-person hugs and visits that make life worth living.

 

Q –My (insert person here) died and there is a funeral – should I go?

A –No. Avoid large gatherings period but even more concerning – if you have a person in your family that got really sick, you are playing with fire – I have seen multiple members of the same family get destroyed by this disease – there is a genetic susceptibility that we haven’t really characterized yet so take your Covid family history seriously.

 

Q – I had to go to the hospital – am I going to die?

A –No. The vast majority of people will not have to go to the hospital. Of the people that have to get admitted to the hospital for oxygen, only a small portion need the ICU (around a quarter of them) and only half of those will need a ventilator, and only half of those will die – and I’ve had lots of old people get this and come out okay on the other side, but having said that – if you are helping to make decisions for an old sick relative, especially if they had kidney failure beforehand (have been on dialysis treatments) that’s a really bad set-up. People with kidney failure from either diabetes or high blood pressure or both have had those diseases for a long time – and their bodies and blood vessels are far older than they look. Don’t neglect the suffering they may be enduring in the ICU. Especially if their quality of life was not so great beforehand –they often suffer for weeks in the ICU before dying and sometimes it takes a clearheaded person in the family to say that so-and-so might “be a fighter” but that doesn’t mean that if they could make their own choices that they would choose to die in pain.

 

Science and Epidemiology

 

Q –How important are masks?

A –Hard to say for sure but they do slow down spread so we should be embracing them. Having said that, masks when you’re alone, when you’re outside alone, in other words when you’re in low risk situations just doesn’t make that much difference and if it keeps you from complying in high-risk (indoor, crowded) situations – then refocus you energies on those high-risk situations. There is such a thing as alarm fatigue, compassion fatigue, concern fatigue, stress fatigue, fatigue fatigue.   Embrace the mask when you need it so you can do the most good. However… don’t kid yourself – even if everyone had masked up right away, we still would have this disease to deal with and we’d be having similar conversations off and on for the next few years.

 

Q – I read a lot about the R0 – (pronounced R’naught). What is the R0 for this virus?

A –The overall R0 (the number of new cases each confirmed case is likely to generate) will change based on the social context – part of avoiding large events/super-spreader events is to reduce spread (not eliminate – that’s impossible kids). So when we change our exposures/behavior as group, this also affects the R0 and that’s why outdoor events are better than indoor and small events are far less worrisome than large from a public health standpoint.

 

Q –Why is the mortality always changing, and/or going down when more people are getting infected?

A – A few reasons. 1) we are getting better at treating covid19, 2) the people who are getting it are generally younger and healthier so fewer (not zero) are dying 3) it’s too soon – diagnosis lags 1-2 weeks behind the infection event, and the deaths lag 2-4 weeks after the diagnosis, and the reporting lags a week after the deaths. So depending on the data you are looking at, it's always already somewhat behind. That’s okay – it’s true of the night sky too – if you don’t know what I mean, I recommend a “A Brief History of Time” by Stephen Hawking.

 

Q –Why are we doing worse than the rest of the world on Covid measures?

A –We are a large heterogenous country, with lots of tolerance for individual liberty which simply prevents us from doing the draconian public health measures that are needed to really control a highly transmissible respiratory illness. We also have had no leadership (or counterproductive anti-leadership) on a Federal level so our responses and decision making have all been on a local level. This is not good but it is also not all bad - the good news is that your local environment i.e. Your local ICUs and hospital capacity are a good measure of how well your local area is dealing with the pandemic/epidemic and opening and closing the tap (see below) can and should be done a hyperlocal level. In addition, and I cannot emphasize this enough – any reckoning of “how we’re doing” needs to account for the fact that we are still very early on in this pandemic – this is a new disease for our species (more below) and it will be a long time before we get a real handle on the health, economic (also important!), and psychosocial (also important!) impacts.

 

Q –Why don’t we just hunker down and wait for a vaccine – it’ll be here by the end of the year.

A –Already we’ve shown that we can’t do that. Not only is it really hard on our economy (just ask any of your friends and family who are unemployed how their pandemic is going and you’ll have more insight) but be aware that we have never had a vaccine for this type of virus before and furthermore, vaccines have their own problems (some can actually make diseases worse) and often offer only partial protection to some of the population. Usually older sicker people have less robust reactions to vaccines if they do at all. I think we will generally have access to some partial protection in about 2 years and a large portion of our population will be nervous about getting it - in this case, rightly so since any of these vaccine candidates will have been vetted far less for safety than previous vaccine efforts. In addition, as I said, many vaccines only lessen the impact of an infection and do not prevent infection and it is very hard to tell how any given person will respond to an inoculation. So again, eventually we will all be rolling the dice. I do think that in 5 years or so we will have a lot of the data we would like on a couple of different vaccine options and our antiviral and complication therapies will have improved, but by then you will have been inundated with so many Covid “horror” stories, dead celebrities, as well as recession fatigue and mental illness, that it’s hard to predict where most people's heads will be.

 

Q –If I get Covid can I get it again? Am I safe if I had it before? I think I had it in January or February – actually I’m sure I did, I was really sick.

A –No one really knows. You probably wouldn’t get it again immediately and probably never quite as bad, but that’s a guess. Also, if you think you had it before April and live in San Diego, you didn’t. There was a very nasty strain of para-influenza virus that swept through the US this winter and in the early Spring. That was what you had (probably). While it is tempting to think a sizable fraction of the population has already been infected even outside of the New York area – they haven’t. And for my San Diego peeps – that’s definitely true of you.   We simply didn’t have the body count to support that and now independent antibody testing here confirms that our population still remains largely unexposed. That will shift over the course of the next two years. Hopefully not all on the same week! Also a quick word about antibody testing – as of now, it’s not helpful for an individual – until there’s a larger pre-test exposed population amongst us there is still a 50/50 chance that any positive is a false positive– so don’t be a sucker for that either. You can look up specificity and pre-test probability for extra credit on your own time.

 

Q –You are talking about time frames like 2 years… 5 years… are you crazy?!

A –No, I’m not. Which brings me to the point – if you are living in a way right now that you can’t sustain for that period of time, you probably have to tweak your personal behavioral code to match your personal risk/benefit calculation. It’s probably not reasonable for most of us to not meet anyone new in person for 2-5 years (or to demand that people do so). Likewise it probably is reasonable to limit indoor events to just small groups of participants and to ask everyone to mask up in those contexts.

 

Q –California has like tons of metrics to measure what we should be doing/opening, etc. why aren’t we hearing more about that and blah blah blah.

A –As I’ve said before – the only metric that really matters is hospital/ICU space. If you have hospital/ICU space then people who would survive with good care won’t die from inadequate care. The rest is all gobbledygook that are best-guesses for surrogate endpoints. Think of it like a tap. When the hospitals get full you close the tap (risky social interactions: multi-people and indoors) until they are less full and when they are less full you open the tap (more interactions) until they start to fill up again.  It is trial and error and it’s the best way we have to minimize avoidable death. Notice I said “avoidable” deaths – not all deaths. This will kill quite a few people and while that’s sad it's also part of life. Everyone gets sick and everyone dies – what is so scary is that this is a brand new way to get sick or die.

 

Q –What about my kids?

A –They’ll be fine. In fact, we should all be super thankful to our gods and monsters that this doesn’t affect kids more severely – there’s no obvious biological reason that should be the case – imagine for a minute if you were asking people to go to work (and feed you) if there was even a 5% chance this disease would kill their children or put them in the hospital.   Now take a deep breath and be ecstatic that almost all kids will shrug this off.  Having said that, we don’t know much about kids as transmitters and/or reservoirs but they probably are, and that is just another reason this will be with us for a long time. Oh, and you cat people – probably your cat is a reservoir too – ah well, nature is funny. One thing that is a rotten shame is that keeping your kids super isolated is probably not a great idea (they need peers for their brains to grow, and you – as much you’d like to be – are not a peer). So you might need to let them out into the world even if it puts you (and the adults they interact with) at some risk, but again that’s a decision each parent has to make.

 

Q –No seriously, what about that Kawasaki thing that happens to kids?

A –It happens really rarely – like barely at all, and it’s pretty easy to treat with steroids. But this brings up a good point – this is a new disease, and so as it affects so many people (literally hundreds of millions of people will be infected this year and billions in the next 5 years or so). We will see lots of unusual cases and unusual outcomes and unusual stories – but these shouldn’t dramatically impact your thinking about what you should or shouldn’t be doing. You don’t stop flying because of a crash and you shouldn’t stop eating because a friend got food poisoning. There are lots of horrible, kill-you-tomorrow-with-no-warning things that pop out of nowhere (google aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage if don’t feel like sleeping tonight) but we live our lives by basically internalizing and then largely ignoring that we are all going to suffer and die. That’s been tough to do the last few months since Covid has dominated everyone’s every waking moment – but we do need to remind ourselves that just because we are gonna die doesn’t mean we shouldn’t live and that to be alive is an inherently unsafe state of being. It always was.

 

Q –Why didn’t this just “go away?”

A- There are so many things that do just “go away.” But this actually points out some very interesting things about the times in which we live. First of all, if you put in place leaders that want to hollow out and dismantle the government (and they do that) then you don’t have government available to deal with a real crisis. And that’s what this is – a real crisis. Many crises are non-sense. Trade wars, real wars, the price of a paperclip – these are all things that humans agree to disagree on, and because of that – they are hugely impacted by perception. These joint delusions about whether a piece of paper (dead trees with ink) can really make you rich or poor is a function of our agreement that it does, and therefore is subject to the “reality distortion fields” that Steve Jobs used to motivate engineers to make the iPhone and motivates the Instagram Universe to make Kylie Jenner a star. However, there is a layer of reality that doesn’t care what you agree to or not – it just is. This objective reality is reminding us in gentle terms that we can throw whatever tantrums or parties we’d like – nature does not care. There are basically two human responses to nature – Faith which helps us to appreciate and accept nature, and Science, which helps us to understand and influence nature. When we turn our backs on Science we are basically throwing our hands up and saying to nature – do whatever, I give up, my Faith and Philosophy will help me accept whatever comes. That’s a totally okay thing to do – it’s just not what I want to do. So, in the future you will find me a more vocal advocate for Science – and I hope you will be too.

 

I hope this was somewhat helpful and if not – no big deal. Try to remember that everyone is suffering, each of us in a slightly different but equally valid/terrible way, and if it’s possible to be nice to someone – especially someone who is suffering in a way different than you, it might be good karma to do that. Just a suggestion.

 


Saturday, May 30, 2020

Dave's soil mix for growing succulent and desert plants

My seed raising mix, essentially identical to Mesa Garden's recipe
My seed raising mix, similar to Mesa Garden's recipe
Here is my soil mix for succulent and desert plants. The mix should be mostly mineral materials with minimal organic matter so that it mimics the low oragnic content of desert soils. This doesn't mean the soil is necessarily poor in nutrients. Mineral materials contain the inorganic salts that plants combine with water and carbon dioxide to create organic molecules using photosynthesis. A mineral soil is suitable for most plants. Think about a hydroponic system, there are no organic components in the system other than the plants. Most plants do not require an organic component in their soil.

Main mix. This is what I use for almost all my succulents and desert plants.

1 part decomposed granite (DG)
1 part coconut coir
1 part perlite
1 part red scoria

You can substitute different items depending on what's available in your area.  If you live in an arid or semi-arid area and have good desert soil, e.g. "sandy loam", you can substitute it for decomposed granite (DG).  Pool filter sand can also be used to replace the DG component, but it doesn't have the fine particles and soluble nutrients of DG and I personally don't like it. Coconut coir can be substituted with peat or commerically available "cactus potting soil". Coconut coir is best obtained as dehydrated compressed bricks for easy storage and transportation, and it's fairly sterile. Perlite can be substituted with pumice. Do not use vermiculite as it holds too much water. Red scoria can be substituted with black scoria. Some components can also be left out and the mix made from only two or three of the components.  The aim is to create a well draining soil with little organic matter.  You can also vary the ratio of the components for different ypes of tplants.

Seedling mix
Use Mesa Garden's germination tips and follow them to the letter.

2 parts coir (replaces Coconut blend potting mix)
2 part decomposed granite (replaces sandy loam)
1 part perlite (for aeration and drainage)
1 part vermiculite. (to hold water, young seedlings require constant moisture for the first year or so)


- Dave Bad Person


In defense of science, for science's sake







In my previous blog I mentioned this letter from Brazilian scientists, who were speaking out against those who profess to speak for science.  I put a similar post on Facebook as well, and someone shared my post, which resulted in the thread below.  



Tim shared a post
May 28
    Dave Bad Person added a post
    May 26
Some scientists in Brazil decided to speak out against anyone who professes to speak for science with regard to the pandemic. And how did they do this? By speaking for science!
At the end of the article each scientist who contributed to it is measured by how many citations they have, not by what contribution they've made to society. This is a perfect example of how academia has become a self-referential system where researchers chase citations and kudos from fellow researchers, rather than trying to solve real world problems. And don't you dare "dishonestly usurp science's prestige", because these children of the wealthy, these glorified hobbyists, these unqualified educators, they want to keep science for themselves, to be conducted only at universities, only by people with PhDs, to be hidden away in obscure academic journals that hardly anyone reads. They know science belongs to everyone, but they want to keep a monopoly on it, solely for their own benefit. Wankers.

Nelly
This post is bullshit Tim. Why would you put this out in the world? Are you anti-science now? Have you always been? Citations tell us that researchers are published and do peer-reviewed science.

Tim
By no means anti-science.
I like diverse opinion.
Dave is a very cynical and smart dude who has been deep inside academia, intelligentsia, and corporate science when he isn't blowing himself up in the desert.
He could probably be a speaker for Science On Tap for any number of topics. BTW, he makes a mean curry.
I posted the original article and he reposted into his timeline (you see top level here) and thought this was an interesting take.
Personally this was the first time I had seen an academic touting how many citations they had. Didn't realize that was a badge of honor of sorts which makes sense.
But I also see how it can be like a circle jerk of instagram influencers liking each other's work.
An interesting counter to my initial post.


This sub thread between Tim and Nelly went on further but veered off the topic.


Raymon
The interwebs distruption bots are strong with this one.



My response to Nelly


Dave Bad Person
I'm not anti-science, I'm anti-academia. I had a 17 year career studying and working in universities around the world as a biomedical researcher, and for the last 14 years I've worked in corporate research & development in the electronics engineering industry in San Diego, California. There is much I could say about academia, more than can be said here, but the core of it is in that post. The fact is that most of the research going on in the world doesn't happen at universities, nor is it conducted by people with PhDs (I have a PhD). University academics tend to think they have the monopoly on science and scientific research. They don't. I understand that universities are important educational institutions which produce highly trained professionals for society, but that is an entirely separate enterprise from the scientific research conducted at universities. Actually, most universities don't require their faculty to even have qualifications in teaching, which really just makes them hobbyist educators, amateurs. As for the research, there are currently about 2.5 million scholarly articles published each year in over 28,000 academic journals, most of them with a tiny readership. Most scientific journal articles are read in full by no more than 10 people. We currently produce more scientific data than we can ever use. Meanwhile, most of the progress in the last 25 years has come not from science, but from engineering. Science needs to be put to work for society, not hoarded away in the musty halls of academia, to be conducted only by those who've paid their dues to be part of the system. In the mid-20th century the investment in university research clearly resulted in a good return for society, but that's not so certain anymore.

Sean
Do you think this quantity-over-quality trend has anything to do with the move away from publicly funded basic science to corporate work that focuses on niches and profit opportunities?

Sean
My biggest concerns about this article are 1. It doesn't really suggest an opposing viewpoint, but rather undermines the credibility of science in general while 2. supporting the political views of the ruling administration of Brazil, which has a hard-right stance bordering on authoritarianism and has been seen to spread propaganda and silence opposing voices.

Dave Bad Person
Sean, firstly, you seem to embrace the false dichotomy of basic vs. applied research. You can do both. As for corporate niche research, academic research is even more niche, fringe, and offbeat. And if it's not profitable or at least useful then it adds no value to society. If that leads to quantity over quality then it's just producing more of something we can't use.

Dave Bad Person
Sean, it d
oes not undermine the credibility of science at all. Science still works, it just doesn't have to be owned and controlled by university academics simply because they consider themselves the only people who should be conducting and speaking for science. Acadmics don't "own" science, it doesn't "belong" to them, it belongs to everyone. Questioning the authority and control of science by academics is something I'll never stop doing.
I'm not supporting the Brazilian political system with my post, not in any way.
And in the end, what did the Brazilian scientist's letter achieve? Nothing. Nothing except another tally mark on the citation count for those involved in writing it. "Publish or perish", the old adage of academia, as if reaching an annual quota of publications and getting kudos from your fellow reseachers is more important than solving real world problems. Society does not allow academics enormous freedoms just so they can engage in frivolous nonsense, while society gets nothing in return.

Sean
Dave Bad Person, 
I understand that basic and applied research are both important and not necessarily distinct. What I mean is that basic research with public accountability and no specific commercial application is on the decline while applied research is being done primarily by corporations with a profit motive. That doesn't necessarily lead to bad science, but it does select what kinds of science get done.
As for the article itself, it reads like an ad hominem attack on the researchers behind the current understanding of this pandemic and the recommendations being issued and not a refutation of the science with better science.

Sean
Dave Bad Person, 
I also disagree with the idea that science with no commercial application isn't valuable. Not much money can be made at this point from the discoveries in astrophysics over recent decades, but the understanding of our universe has huge value, especially over the arc of history. Medicines that cure chronic conditions rapidly would be less profitable than ones made to treat symptoms for long periods of time but I think we, as a species, are better served in the long term by the former.

Dave Bad Person
Basic research with public accountability. What kind of accountability are we talking about, citation counts?
Well I have a "whole" four publications in biomedical research that have been cited hundreds of times. Does anyone care? Did they make a difference in the world? No.
I also helped invent the LTE technology that billions of people around the world use everyday on their cell phones to communicate, interact, entertain themselves, and be productive. Does it make a difference in he world? Hell yes. I'm also currently working to help invent the various technologies that will make 5G work. Do you think it will it make a difference too?
But I guess astrophysics is going to be super valuable some day, because the goals and utility of astrophysics is...??? How many times a day do you use your smart phone's high speed wireless data connection to the internet, and how many times a day do you use astrophysics? Maybe you should get to work on those disease cures, you could solve important problems AND make profit.

Sean
Dave Bad Person, 
Public accountability meaning research that's funded by and conducted primarily for the good of the public, not a private entity. I don't quite understand the hostility coming through in your comments here. I guess your commitment to the deeply important field of consumer electronics is commendable? I don't deny that communication is an important tool for society, but really man? Science without a big payout isn't worth it?

Raymon
Dave Bad Person, 
you had me, until you said profit. One day, far far in the future, profit, money even won't be needed. Collective efforts, for the common good will become the norm. Maybe I'm a delusional snowflake, but name one time that star-trek ever showed the exchange of money?

Raymon
Oh, except the foriengi, but they were dicks.

Dave Bad Person
Sure. Science without a payout isn't worth it to me. I did that career for 17 years and at the end of all those years of study, hard work, and dedication I was getting paid barely more than minimum wage, had crappy benefits, and lived on the brink of poverty, same as I'd grown up. It was completely unrewarding both financially and intellectually. Meanwhile most of the PhDs I worked with were from fairly wealthy families, and thus money and employment had never been major concerns in their lives, and so they'd had the luxury of being able to chase their frivolous dreams and bizarre interests without concern for where it may lead. You both seem to have the same mental illness as most academics:  a belief that basking in the glory of science is more noble than making a meaningful contributing to society, that science should be purely for academics, and that being coddled and isolated in the university system is better than having to go out in the real world and adapt and compete in the workforce. Maybe your naive idealistic moneyless utopia will materialize one day? Be ready for the disappointment when you realize it's not coming and you based your life philosophy on a stupid science fiction TV show for nerds.



That's all for now.
- Dave Bad Person


Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Academic Wanker Scum





Some scientists in Brazil decided to speak out against anyone who professes to speak for science with regard to the coronavirus pandemic. And how did they do this? By speaking for science!

As you can see at the end of the article, each scientist's worth is measured by how many citations they have, not by what contribution they've made to society, which in my experience is little-to-nothing for most of them. This letter is actually a perfect example of how academia has become a self-referential system where researchers chase citations and kudos from fellow researchers, rather than trying to solve real world problems. And don't you dare "dishonestly usurp science's prestige", because these children of the wealthy, these glorified hobbyists, these unqualified educators, they want to keep science for themselves, to be conducted only at universities, only by people with PhDs, to be hidden away in obscure academic journals that hardly anyone reads.

The letter even goes further to say that "no one can speak for science". Yet here they are speaking for science because they think they own it. Science belongs to everyone, not just university assholes who want to keep the monopoly on science for their own benefit and hide it away from the public. These people have the delusional notion that they're "changing the world" with their irrelevant publications. And what did they change with this letter? Nothing. It was merely a matter of "publish or perish". They simply have to say something because that's what they do, they talk a lot and change nothing. Academic wanker scum. 

- Dave Bad Person

Tuesday, April 7, 2020

Media bias again


January 27th, the day after Kobe Bryant's death. Look at the article on the left, it reports on the first 5 cases of Coronavirus in the US.
https://www.pressreader.com/usa/usa-today-us-edition/20200127/281496458256509

In a January 21st interview with Newsmax, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the epidemiologist who is leading the charge against the virus said "this is not a major threat for the people of the United States, and this is not something that the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about."


February 17th, Dr. Fauci says the risk from Coronavirus is miniscule and to skip the masks unless you're contagious (how would you know you're contagious?) 

By early March, Fauci had changed his tune, saying the virus “could be really, really bad,” but still said he believed the situation could be mitigated
https://www.businessinsider.com/anthony-fauci-coronavirus-could-be-really-really-bad-2020-3

March 27th, CDC Director Robert Redfield told Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade that he agreed with Fauci’s assessment at the time, and said that nobody could have predicted the outbreak that would eventually occur in the U.S.  “Obviously that became corrected as they saw in the first three, four weeks in January that human to human spread was not only occurring it’s actually, as I said, more infectious and I think that led to the situation that we’re in today. I think no one could have predicted how transmissible, how infectious this virus really is,” Redfield said.
https://radio.foxnews.com/2020/03/27/cdc-director-reacts-to-resurfaced-tape-of-dr-anthony-fauci-downplaying-virus-threat/

Those are verifiable statements from the country's top epidemiologists.

But yeah, it's all the Big Bad Orange Man's fault for not listening to his top experts and acting sooner, or at least that's what the liberal media wants you to think. The media does this because they've decided who they do and don't want for president, and they're using their power to sway public opinion to that end. Is that news, the simple reporting of information, or is it something else that has another name? Who do the liberal media work for, because it's clearly not us.

-Dave Bad Person


Sunday, March 22, 2020

My love of university academics knows no bounds.


Well looky there university acadmics, I just landed my first job with a six figure salary:  as a Senior Test Engineer at a large electronics engineering company. We're going to be doing research and development on that 5G thingy that will be going into those new-fangled micro-computers you have in your pockets. 

Meanwhile I'm still waiting for the day when I might get a job in academia in Australia. Almost 30 years later and still waiting for the career that goes nowhere to go somewhere. Like waiting for a train that never comes:  standing on a drab empty railway platform, looking at the clock apprehensively while your life ebbs away. 

Imagine if I was still back there in Canberra, Australia, the city with no industries or reason for existing, other than the indecisiveness of some aristocrats who couldn't decide on Sydney or Melbourne as the capital.  I'd probably be volunteering at the John Curtin School of Medical Research, hopeful that some day someone might notice me and throw me a dollar. I'd probably still be a poor, ignorant, smelly, working-class yobbo with long hair, dirty clothes, and an Australian drawl - I'd still be the same Dave that I was 20 years ago. I might still be living with my mum and dad, except that my dad's been dead for more than a decade and my mum moved away years ago.

Do you know why California is the industrial powerhouse of America and one of the wealthiest places in the world? Because they don't futz around at their universities making bits of paper in obscure academic journals that hardly anyone reads. They apply science and they commercialize it.  I know, it must seem incredible to you.

Well don't worry if those fires didn't take you out, there's still hope that this Coronavirus might do the job. In the meantime maybe you can make a difference by writing some journal articles, because we're going to need more toilet paper.

Haaahahahahaaaa!
- Dave Bad Person




Friday, March 20, 2020

Hindsight is 2020


Don't worry kids, here comes.....

CAPTAIN HINDSIGHT TO THE RESCUE!

"Captain Hindsight here. See that outbreak kids, we should have seen that coming sooner, and we should have done more about it, and..... and of course it's the Big Bad Orange Man's fault, I was writing to the Whitehouse and calling my representative in congress long before anyone else saw this coming, that's how smart I am, but no one wouldn't listen to me...."

That's all for today's episode kids. Tune in again tomorrow when we'll find out if Captain Hindsight is actually Dave Trollpants in disguise, or if he's an entirely new online alter-ego of Dave Bad Person. Until then, remember that Hindsight is 2020, especially in the year 2020!





CAPTAIN HINDSIGHT TO THE RESCUE!

This particular Coronavirus can be genetically traced to a population of cave-dwelling horseshoe bats in Yunnan province. However, it's now believed the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan is where the epidemic started. Around the time the outbreak began the market was seen selling wild, exotic, and farmed animals in cages, and all in close proximity to each other. Such conditions are known to cause recombination of viruses and allows them to hop between species and eventually to humans. This is exactly how the closely related SARS virus started in Guangdong province back in 2002. Among the live animals photographed for sale at Huanan Market just before its closure were:  rats, snakes, wolf puppies, porcupines, foxes, crocodiles, giant salamanders, beavers, deer, pangolins, and badgers, as well as the usual poultry and pigs.

We should have seen this coming and we should have done something about it sooner.

CAPTAIN HINDSIGHT!


- Dave Bad Person







Wednesday, March 18, 2020

This is the best stock buying opportunity since the crash of 2008


Holy crap, this virus idiocy is looking to be the best stock market buying opportunity since the big crash of 2008. I'm in the hiring process for a new job and I can't wait to start so I can get paid and start buying stocks. The DOW is down a almost a third in a month, S&P is down over 20%, Kimberly Clark paper company is all over the place like a mad woman's breakfast! The only stock I have left these days is a REIT and I've lost my shirt on it, down 97%. It's not even worth selling it, I just gotta hold it until it goes back up. This new job will hopefully also have some stock options coming with it when I start, so I'll be getting those at a good time. 

I'm loving this social distancing thing too, I don't even have to show up for my current half-job!

If there's one thing I learned from the stock market crash of 2008, it's that you buy and hold. Buy buy buy, hold hold hold. My wife has been telling me this for years and she was right, just like she is 97% of the time, even when I won't admit it.
Thanks Wife! ❤️💜😱

Yup, I've had enough of slacking off and it's time to get back to work.

Thursday, March 12, 2020

Evidence that the media hysteria about Coronavirus is politically motivated


Here's a little lesson for you in how powerful the media is for controlling public opinion and manipulating crowd psychology.... 

Obama era, June 2009 to August 2010:  the CDC estimates that about 61 million people in the US were infected by H1N1, also known as Swine flu, resulting in 274,000 hospitalizations and 12,500 deaths.

Media response:  pretty chill. A Google search for "H1N1 toilet paper" finds no past articles about bulk toilet paper purchases or shelves emptied of toilet paper. A Google image search for the same words returns no images of bulk toilet paper purchases or shelves emptied of toilet paper. 


Trump era, 2020:  as of 4pm EST yesterday, the CDC has confirmed 1215 cases of Coronavirus and 36 deaths in the US.

Media response:  attempt to induce public mass hysteria. A Google search for "Coronavirus toilet paper" yields dozens if not hundreds of articles about bulk toilet paper purchases and shelves emptied of toilet paper. A Google image search for the same words reveals similar coverage of the topic.

If you're you think this epidemic isn't being politicized because this is an election year, I would say that based on that data alone, you're wrong. Is the liberal media pushing an agenda because they've decided who they want (or don't want) for president? I'll leave that up to you to decide. We've already seen what they've done with trying to suppress Bernie. Do you really think the liberal media works for you? 



- Dave Bad Person


Epilogue:  after talking to friends overseas whose countries are not having election years, but still have media hysteria and mass toilet paper buying, I have to conclude that the news coverage of the virus isn't entirely political at all. So there you go.



References










Wednesday, March 11, 2020

Why we need to completely abandon usage of the Latin language


I wish we'd give up on Latin. Other than its use by monks and nuns in monastic and cathedral schools during the Middle Ages, it's a language that's been dead for 1500 years.

When these religious schools eventually evolved into the first universities around the time of the Renaissance, Latin continued to be used because it was a common language of learning that allowed communication between people from different regions of Europe.  So that's why we have this dead language clinging to existence more than 1500 years after the fall of Rome.

Let's look a little deeper into how pointless it is to continue using this dead language that hardly anyone in the world is able to write, understand, or speak.


Singulars and Plurals
It used to be annoying having to remember obscure Latin singulars and plurals like antennae, vortices, criterion, matrices, addenda, cacti, and so on. As if English spelling isn't enough of a disaster already, then we had these plurals from a dead language to deal with as well.  Fortunately these have now been largely abandoned in favor of simple English plurals with an '-s' or '-es' on the end of the word.

Anatomy
Every body part of every animal is named in Latin. The 16th century scholar Andreas Vesalius is considered the father of modern anatomy and can be credited for expanding the use of Latin in naming body parts. Vesalius was actually born in Brussels and spoke Flemish, a dialect of Dutch, and his name was actually Andries van Wesel. However it was common and often necessary for scholars of his time to Latinize their names so they would be seen as recognized university academics, and could publish in scholarly journals, and cite the works of other people who had also Latinized their names.

As a former neuroscientist and someone who knows a little Latin, I know that the parts of the brain are given Latin names. Some examples of brain anatomical structures are:

  • amygdala
  • caudate
  • putamen
  • hippocampus
  • cortex
  • corpus striatum
  • locus coeruleus

Why did early anatomists give these parts those names?  Well the simple answer is they did it because they had no idea what these structures were for or what they did, so they simply named them after their shape or appearance. That's right!  Those Latin names are actually just names for the shape or appearance of the parts they describe.  Here are those words again in English:

  • almond
  • tail
  • husk
  • sea horse
  • bark
  • striped body
  • blue spot

Clearly the people who named these parts didn't have the faintest clue about them, so to hide their ignorance from ordinary people, they named them in Latin so they could appear intelligent and knowledgeable when talking about them. Like I said earlier, universities are derived from monastic and cathedral schools, and if you've ever spent even the smallest amount of time talking to people in a monastery, convent, or purely academic research, you'll know that they're extremely ignorant, mostly because of the isolated life they lead, which shelters them from the general population and the dynamic world of culture, industry, and commerce going on around them. If you want to appear intelligent and educated, it helps to use words that ordinary people can't understand.


Binomial Nomenclature
The term "binomial nomenclature" is another Latin term which literally means "two-name name-calling".  Binomial nomenclature is the system of naming all living things using two Latin words to uniquely identify that living thing.  It was invented by an 18th century Swedish professor with a German name called Karl von Linne.  Linne was like other scholars of his time in that he Latinized his name. Thus he's always referred to as Carolus Linnaeus. He was the first and most well known taxonomist:  a classifier and namer of biological organisms.  Most biologists don't even know that his real name was not Linnaeus.


Why not English?
Today in the early 21st century the language of learning and science is English. It's certainly not stupid old Latin.  So why are we still using this old Latin crap?  Well obviously the main reason is historical. The other reason is that university academics are actually not the forefront of all that's new and great in the world, and due to their isolation from society, and the traditionalist system in which they're embedded, they're stuck in these old ways.  Like I've said earlier, if you've ever talked to monks or nuns you'll quickly find they're very ignorant people due to their sheltered life and isolation from the outside world.  From my 17 years experience in academia, I found that the same thing can be said of university academics, and it's true that I myself was kept ignorant by the isolation of academic life.  Academics like to think they're at the forefront of change and progress, but in reality the sheltered academic lifestyle has coddled them and turned them into ignoramuses (or is it ignorami?). Their academic freedom means they aren't required to adapt and compete in response to external cultural and economic forces. So progress at universities tends to happen only at glacial speeds:  for example, they're still using Latin from the Renaissance period for fuck's sake!  Most of the research that happens in the world today doesn't happen in universities, even though most academics seem to think that universities have the monopoly on research, but that's only because most of them have never worked outside of one.


The solution?
The solution is simple.  Stop using Latin altogether.  Abandon Latin plurals. Make a new binomial system using English words.  Start naming parts of anatomy using English words.  Once we do this, the names of things will actually make sense, rather than being some jargon in a dead language that no one understands, and that people simply repeat like parrots with no idea what they really mean. Stop this idiotic monopoly of university academics naming things in Latin.  In fact, most academics don't even know any Latin, they just mouth the words, often mispronouncing them, just so they can fit in and give the appearance of being intelligent and educated, when in fact the opposite is more likely to be true.  Often they take Greek words, or words from other languages, or even the names of their research buddies that they want to impress, and they Latinize them for use in naming things, such is the ongoing insanity of this academic Latin craze. 

It's time to let Latin die for good. The sooner we can wrench education and scholarship out of the restrictive hands of university academics, the sooner we can get rid of Latin, and the sooner we can make better and more meaningful progress in the world.


- Dave Bad Person









Why we need English spelling reform?

dfdf

Tuesday, March 10, 2020

Why doesn't California have the permanent daylight savings we voted for?


So how come California still has the switch to daylight savings if we voted back in the 2018 midterm election to stay on daylight savings permanently? 
Because the bill stalled in the state senate because they were concerned over how it would be implemented.

Well I have a fucking clue about that implementation for you, you worthless procrastinating masturbating state senate knob-jockeys:  you spring forward an hour and then you never change your clocks back ever again!  It's called "change" and it requires you to hop off that dick that's up your ass for a moment and actually do something.


https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Whatever-happened-to-year-round-daylight-saving-15111665.php


- Dave Bad Person